Wednesday, 8 October 2014

'Strangers On A Train' - Shot Analysis

Name of movie:  Strangers on a Train
Director: Alfred Hitchcock
Stars: Farley Granger, Ruth Roman and Robert Walker
Date released: June 30th, 1951

The movie is in black and white so instead of looking at colours, I'll look at contrasts.



  1. Shot time: 6 minutes, 15 seconds into the movie
The shot used is an over-the-shoulder, medium close-up shot to allow the viewer to get a glimpse of Guy Haines' (played by Farley Granger) reactions to the strong opinions and suggestions being made by Bruno Anthony (played by Robert Walker) whilst continuing to show how relaxed Bruno is about revealing all of this to Guy - whether this is due to Bruno's intentions to have Guy kill his father for him or whether it's the side affects of the alcohol he's consumed is unclear. We also see Bruno's relaxation around Guy despite their topic of conversation through Bruno's lack of care for personal space as he slaps Guy's hand away when he reaches to take away his drink before the conversation goes any further.

Both characters in the shot are seen in suits of some description to show off their wealth compared to others on the train - although we learn that it was most likely that it was Bruno's mother that bought him the suit as his father 'hates him' and he doesn't appear to have at the moment (suggested by him speaking about how his father thinks he should be doing).




Tuesday, 7 October 2014

Comic Book Genre: Why is it so popular?

Superhero movies are becoming increasingly popular in recent years because people from any age group can get into the franchises and depending on which character(s) is (are) in the film, they'll be more relateable.

The Comic Book genre also allows for strong genre mixtures (in particular action and romance).

Their fan-base has always been around just in comic-book format, so by making film adaptions of those comic books, they're making the story's and characters more accessible to the newer generations. Their post-production teams are insanely sophisticated, and it allows for fresh activity in old genres.

DC
Main franchise: Justice League - focus on Batman and Superman
The first Superman film (1978) was nominated for 3 Oscars and grossed $300,000,000 in the original film run. Flying was achieved through wire suspensions and blue screen animations (blue screen matte shots and zooming in and out) and front projection. The success of the first film spurred 3 further films in the franchise in this style.
In more recent years The Dark Knight Rises was released and in its first film run, grossed $1.084 billion.

Marvel
Main franchises: The Avengers, X-Men and the Fantastic Four
In the early 00's Marvel brought back attention to the Comic Book genre with Spiderman (grossing $821 million), X-Men (grossing $296 million) and The Hulk (grossing $245 million), with Spiderman being one of the top grossing films in the 00's.
In more recent years they've released The Avengers and Iron Man 3, grossing $1.518 billion and $1.215 billion in their first runs respectively.

Monday, 6 October 2014

Hollywood's Golden Age vs Modern Hollywood notes

Hollywood's Golden Age compared with current Hollywood

In the beginning of Hollywood and it's Golden Age, there were five main studios: Warner Brothers, Paramount, Fox Film, RKO Pictures and Loew. Currently, 4 out of these 5 studios are still in business - with Fox Film changing their name to 20th Century Fox and Loew changing their name to MGM - while RKO Pictures was dissolved in 1959. Not only this, but there are over a dozen major film studios in LA including the ever-growing DreamWorks Studios and Walt Disney Studios.

To begin with, film studios had control over everything to do with a movie - from the actors, to the directors, the film studios controlled everything that was going on, meanwhile in current day Hollywood, the studios make film deals while having ongoing deals with directors - such as Steven Speilburg, who has a 'first option' choice of film with Dreamworks - so he gets first dibs on any of their film deals.

When films were first made - and particularly in Hollywood's Golden Age - they were much more experimental with camera angles and story lines - however they would still go for similar types of actors and/or characters, however there were always favoured genres - specifically during the Golden Age, romance, comedy and western films were preferred by the masses, most likely due to the family friendliness most of them had, allowing for the family to go for a night out together.

Meanwhile, current day Hollywood films are much more set in their ways for cinematography and target audiences, although through advances in technology such as CGI, they've been able to expand their audiences - not only this, but they've also managed to expand their range of actors and character types, thus becoming much more inclusive. Not only this but the general popularity of film genres currently have shifted to more action-based films such as comic-book and novel adaptions (e.g. Marvel comics and Harry Potter). Also, where as in the Golden Age, all the profit had to come from the box office sales alone, currently the merchandise sold during and after the films release brings in most of the profits (from DVD's to posters to mugs to t-shirts).

Thursday, 2 October 2014

'Fractured Fairy Tales' - Notes for class presentation

Notes on the Sub-Genre 'Fractured Fairy Tales'

'Fractured Fairy Tales' is a sub-genre of the Fairy Tale Genre. It is most commonly a combination of the 'Fairy Tale' and either 'Action', 'Horror' or 'Adventure' genres in films.
While Fractured Fairy Tales as a general genre ranges from become more adult-focused as "Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters" and "Snow White and the Huntsman", it also contains films such as the Shrek quadrilogy, however my notes are more focused on the less child-friendly kind.


When did the genre become popular?

The genre has become increasingly popular after the mild success of "The Brothers Grimm", however it's popularity has skyrocketed after the greater success of Tim Burton's film adaption of "Alice in Wonderland" which is currently the 17th highest-grossing film at the box office

10 Most Grossing Films of the genre:


At the box office:

  1. Alice in Wonderland (2010) - $1.025 billion
  2. Maleficent (2014) - $756.7 million
  3. Oz the Great and Powerful - $493.311 million
  4. Snow White and the Huntsman - $396.592 million
  5. Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters - $226.349 million
  6. Jack the Giant Slayer - $197.687 million
  7. Mirror Mirror - $183.018 million
  8. The Brother's Grimm - $105.316 million
  9. Red Riding Hood - $89.162 million
  10. Beastly - $43.165 million

How reliant is the genre on adaptions?

The sub-genre is entirely reliant on adaptions, as (stated in the name of the sub-genre) for them to be included in the genre, the must be adapted from or take strong influence from a Fairy Tale - however the way the movie interprets the Fairy Tales are entirely up to the director

What is the target audience?

The main target audience for this sub-genre are mostly female teens and young adults, as they're more known to be more attached to and have grown up on classic Disney films such as Aladdin, Alice in Wonderland and Snow White - despite all of those movies having come out years before they were born. Despite that being the general target audience, these films also target males of the same age-range through the chosen actors and actress's and in the increased adrenaline rush but also through the same trait that attracts females of their age - the characters they knew as children have matured. We all know that the stories of Disney's princesses weren't that simple, sweet and child-friendly to begin with, and film makers are using that realization that's happening in their target audiences minds to make characters more accessible to them - they aren't perfect and pristine role models who never do anything wrong, they're more realistic and the plots of these new movies match.

However, while looking at how well these movies did at the box office, I realised something else - the majority of these movies do better outside of the U.S.A. - where most of them are produced. I think this may be a more traditional problem rather than American citizens simply not liking the genre - I believe people brought up in the U.S.A. are often brought up with the Disney movies alone, and even if they weren't they're aware that the stories are set in countries thousands of miles away from them, meanwhile those brought up in countries such as Germany or France - where a large number of the original stories of these Disney films are set - feel a stronger connection to the story as they're brought up knowing that they live close to where some of their childhood fantasies are, and hence forth will be more interested in seeing how someone's adapted it.

What are it's sub-genres?

It's a sub-genre itself, however there are 3 main genres used in conjunction with the necessary 'Fairy Tale' genre to create a Fractured Fairy Tale movie:
'Action' - such as Hansel & Gretel: Witch Hunters (2013)
'Horror' - such as Red Riding Hood (2011)
'Adventure' - such as Alice in Wonderland (2010)

What kind of merchandise is sold for films in this genre?

The most common kind of official merchandise sold for this sub-genre are posters, mugs and t-shirts, however if the film is made by Disney, then they're almost certain to release a few dolls and/or teddies of the main characters depending on the characters used in the film.

However, if a film is received positively from the audience, they may get a large enough fanbase to have people make unofficial merchandise, such as cosplay items, their own posters, keyrings and even stickers.

Who are some directors, producers and actors linked to this genre?


Directors: Tim Burton, Robert Stromberg, Sam Raimi

Producers: Tim Burton, Joe Roth

Actors: Johnny Depp, Angelina Jolie, Helena Bonham

Do you believe this genre have longevity or is it a short-term thing?

Personally, I think this sub-genre could have a long life span - so long as the films are made well and don't all have the same kind of adaption.

Monday, 29 September 2014

'Star Wars' - Case Study

A Critical Study on 'Star Wars'



Name of Film: Star Wars (later titled 'Star Wars Episode IV A New Hope')
Director: George Lucas
Stars: Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker), Harrison Ford (Han Solo), Carrie Fisher (Princess Leia Organa), Peter Cushing (Grand Moff Tarkin) and Alec Guiness (Obi-Wan Kenobi) (stars chosen as those listed on the back of the DVD box set release)
Date Released: May 25th, 1977 (U.S.A.)

Marketing and Merchandise:

Marketing:

When George Lucas prepared his initial 14-page story treatment for the space opera, all of the major studios rejected it as they saw it as science fiction which was difficult to market at the time. Eventually Lucas found a sympathetic ear in the form of Alan Ladd Jr. - who at that point was the new head of 20th Century Fox - who had been impressed by Lucas's efforts on 'American Graffiti', thus after extensive convincing, gave Star Wars the green light with a budget of $8,000,000.


During a market test, the studio tried to change the movie's name as the title 'Star Wars' caused negative results in the testing and thus a competition was held during shooting for cast and crew members to think of a new title, but none of them ever stuck. The main cause of the negative feedback for the movies name was because it contained the word 'Wars' which holds strong negative connotations especially during the immediate aftermath of the Vietnam War.

The initial research done by 20th Century Fox using the title and brief synopsis showed that only males under 25 were interested in seeing the film, thus causing Fox to market the film to try and attract older and female viewers by pushing the images of people (in particular Princess Leia) into the limelight and referring to the movie as more 'mythical' than 'science fiction'.

Charles Lippincott was hired as the marketing director for Star Wars, however due 20th Century Fox giving minimal support for marketing outside licensing t-shirts and posters, Lippincott had to look elsewhere. As a fan of science fiction himself, he managed to secure deals with Marvel Comics for a comic book adaption and with Del Ray Books for novelization and he used his own contacts to promote the film at the San Diego ComicCon and elsewhere within the Science Fiction Fandom.

Due to the movies release date being pushed back to the summer of 1977 instead of the Christmas of 1976, Fox  began to worry that Star Wars would be beaten by other summer films, including 'Smokey and the Bandit'. This worry made Fox move the release date to the Wednesday before Memorial Day yet due to less than 40 theaters ordering the film to be shown, Fox demanded that theatres order Star Wars if they wanted an eagerly awaited film based on the best selling novel 'The Other Side of Midnight'.

Merchandise:

For several months after the film's debut, there was very little merchandise available, with only Kenner Products accepting Lippincott's licensing offers. To deal with the sudden demand for Star Wars toys, they used what is known as an "empty box campaign", where vouchers in the "Star Wars Early Bird Certificate Package" could be traded in for four Star Wars action figures between February and June of 1978.

Despite the film itself being set back to be released in 1977, the novelisation of the film was published at it's initially planned release date in December of 1976 - a whole six months before the film itself was released, but it also included scenes that were cut from the final edit of the film. Whilst the credited author was George Lucas, it was also ghostwritten by Alan Dean Foster, who later went on to write the first Expanded Universe novel (Splinter of the Mind's Eye).


Marvel Comics also adapted the film as the first few issues of its licensed Star Wars comic book, unlike the novel adoption, the first issue was released after the films debut, in July 1977, yet it also contained scenes that didn't make it to the final cut of the movie. The comic series was so successful that (according to Jim Shooter) it '… single-handedly saved Marvel' during 1977 and 1978.

In 1979, Lucasfilm gave the film a 24-page children's book-and-record adaption (narrated by Roscoe Lee Brown) where each page contained a cropped screenshot of a key section from the film and a condensed version of the story.

In 1981, a radio drama adaption of the film was produced for and broadcasted on the American National Public Radio network. Written by Brian Daley and directed by John Madden, the adaption received cooperation from George Lucas who gave them the rights to use the films original soundtrack, whilst Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker) and Anthony Daniels (C-3PO) voiced their original characters. Once again, this adaption contained more scenes removed from the final cut - including Darth Vader's interrogation of Princess Leia, and a skyhopper race.




Initial and Later Success:

Releases:

Star Wars debuted on Wednesday the 25th of May, 1977 in less than 32 theatres, with only 8 more showing it on the following two days. Despite few theatres showing the film, it instantly broke box office records and essentially becoming one of the first ever blockbuster films, causing Fox to increase their plans to broaden it's release.

The film was a huge success for the studio, causing 20th Century Fox's stock price to doubled to a record high within just three weeks of it's release. Before then, Fox's greatest annual profits were $37,000,000, but in 1977, the company easily broke that record by passing a profit of $79,000,000. Despite the film's cultural neutrality allowing it to receive international success, Ladd was anxious at the premiere in Japan as after the film was over the audience was completely silent, however he was soon informed by local connections that silence was in fact the greatest honour a film could receive in Japan.

The subtitles of 'Episode IV: A New Hope' were added starting with the film's re-release on April 10th, 1981. The film was also re-released theatrically in 1997 with additional scenes and enhanced special effects (this version was later further subtitled as the 'Special Edition'). This 'Special Edition' was brought about when Lucas saw that technology had caught up to his original version of Star Wars after the work of ILM used computer-generated effects for Steven Spielberg's Jurassic Park (1993), and thus Star Wars was digitally remastered and re-released to movie theatres alongside The Empire Strikes Back and Return of the Jedi under the campaign title 'Star Wars Trilogy: Special Edition'.

The Special Edition consisted of more visual shots and scenes that were previously unachievable due to a mix of technological, time and budgeting restraints - one such scene being Han Solo meeting Jabba the Hut, however some of the changes made caused controversy among fans - in particular when Han Solo is confronted by a bounty hunter called Greedo, Greedo is made to shoot first when originally it had been Han Solo to shoot first - this change also led to t-shirts being made with the phrase "Hans Shot First" on them.


Box Office:

Even today, Star Wars is one of the most financially successful films of all time, having earned over $1.5 million through it's opening weekend, building up to $7 million  as it entered wide release and by the end of it's initial theatrical run it had earned over $220 million in the U.S.A. and Canada alone, and by the end of the following year, it had earned $410 million worldwide. After the re-releases in the following years, it's overall earnings in the U.S.A. and Canada to $323 million, and extended it's global earnings to $530 million, and it kept it's position as highest-grossing film of all time until 1983, where E.T. the Extra-Terrestial broke the record.

After the release of the Special Edition in 1997, Star Wars once again reclaimed the North American record for a brief period of time before losing it the following year to Titanic. Overall the film's earned $775, 398,007 worldwide, but after adjusting amounts due to inflation, it;s earned over $2.5 billion worldwide (as of 2011 prices and records), making it the most successful franchise film of all time, and according to the Guinness World Records, at the North American box office before inflation it ranks as the 3rd highest grossing film, while after inflation it ranks as the 2nd highest.


Accolades:


With it's cast and crew, Star Wars has won a total of 24 awards since it's release in 1977.
1977:

  • Los Angeles Film Critics Association Award for Best Film
  • Saturn Award for Best Costume (John Mollo)
  • Saturn Award for Best Make-up (Stuart Freeborn)
  • Saturn Award for Best Music (John Williams)
  • Saturn Award for Best Science Fiction Film
  • Saturn Award for Best Special Effects (John Dykstra)
  • Saturn Award for Best Supporting Actor (Alec Guinness)
  • Saturn Award for Best Writing (George Lucas)
1978:
  • Academy Award for Best Costume Design (John Mollo)
  • Academy Award for Best Film Editing (Paul Hirsch, Marcia Lucas and Richard Chew)
  • Academy Award for Best Original Music Score (John Williams)
  • Academy Award for Best Production Design (Roger Christian, Norman Reynolds, John Barry and Leslie Dilley)
  • Academy Award for Best Sound Mixing (Don MacDougall, Derek Ball, Bob Minkler and Ray West)
  • Academy Award for Best Visual Effects (John Dykstra, John Stears, Richard Edlund, Grant McCune and Rober Blalack)
  • Special Achievement Academy Award (Ben Burtt)
  • BAFTA Award for Best Film Music (John Williams)
  • BAFTA Award for Best Sound (Sam Shaw, Robert R. Rutledge, Gordon Davidson, Gene Corso, Derek Ball, Don MacDougall, Bob Minkler, Ray West, Michael Minkler, Les Fresholtz, Richard Portman and Ben Burtt)
  • Golden Globe Award for Best Original Score (John Williams)
  • Hugo Award for Best Dramatic Presentation (George Lucas)
  • Nebula Award for Best Script (George Lucas)
  • People's Choice Award for Favourite Movie 
  • Saturn Award for Best Director (George Lucas)
  • Saturn Award for Best Music (John Williams)
2011:
  • Satellite Award for Best DVD Extra

Saturday, 27 September 2014

'Van Helsing' - Shot Analysis

Name of Film: Van Helsing
Director: Stephen Sommers
Stars: Hugh Jackman and Kate Bekinsale
Date Released: May 3rd, 2004 (Universal City)


  1. Shot ime: 7 minutes, 55 seconds into the movie (screenshot will be added later)
The first 7 minutes of the film are in black and white and the shots used are mostly close-ups of either characters or significant props, so by using an extreme wide shot of the Notre Dame Cathedral in colour shows us that things have changed drastically - even if it's only been a year - as well as giving us an exact reference point of where the scene is set and the horse-drawn carriage gives us a sense of what technologies are in common use - despite all of the sleek and modern-designed weapons that Van Helsing (Hugh Jackman) uses during the movie.

Having most of the prominent colour come from the Notre Dame's stained glass window and from the light of the moon behind one of it's towers makes it the key focus point of the viewer as well as setting the scene for the fight between Van Helsing and Dr Hyde.

Friday, 26 September 2014

'Notorious' - Shot Analysis

Name of Movie: Notorious
Director: Alfred Hitchcock
Stars: Carl Grant and Ingrid Bergman
Date Released: August 15th, 1946 (New York City)

The movie is in black and white so instead of looking at colours, I'll look at contrasts.


  1. Shot time: 3 minutes, 23 seconds into the movie

Devlin, a U.S. Intelligence Agent played by Carl Grant, has his back to the camera throughout the whole part scene, even when the camera changes angles. This makes the viewer curious about his appearance as well as to who he is after Alicia, played by Ingrid Bergman, says that she "loves party crashers". As she says this she seems to look him in the eyes but at the same time look right through him - as though the alcohol and her intrigue with him are the few things that are keeping her up.

The characters visible are the bare minimum - those that are needed for lines - so as not to clog up the screen too much whilst not leaving the screen overly empty either.

Since we can't see the colour of their clothes, they're made to look wealthy through the general style of their clothes - hence why all three men seen in the shot are wearing suits of some description with matching slicked back hair. Meanwhile the two women are shown in two different styles of wealthy clothing - the woman dancing in the background is wearing an expensive looking dress and long-sleeved jacket with puffed shoulders which contrasts greatly with Alicia's short sleeved dress. While the design of Alicia's dress is simple enough, it still seems equally - or even more so - as expensive as the other dress as the darker stripes contain jewels or sequins of some sort which glitter in the lighting.

We also see wealth from the older mans large cigar, the expensive-looking bottles of liquor scattered around the tables of Alicia's home and from Alicia and the old man talking about having a week-long holiday on a ferry.